Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ON-MERRIT D6.3 Synthesis report: ON-MERRIT findings, including disciplinary and gender case studies

Authors: Reichmann, Stefan; Pontika, Nancy; Cole, Nicki Lisa; Correia, Ant��nia; Fava, Ilaria; Fessl, Angela; Jahn, Najko; +8 Authors

ON-MERRIT D6.3 Synthesis report: ON-MERRIT findings, including disciplinary and gender case studies

Abstract

The results summarised in this deliverable are intended to enable Open Science policy to move beyond the current state-of-the-art to better incorporate a self-reflexive critique of the consequences of policy interventions and to reveal gaps and deficiencies in current policy measures. This the project hopes to achieve by making evidence-based policy recommendations on how stakeholders (Research Performing Organisations, Research Funders, and other stakeholders) should amend indicators and reward/incentive schemes to address and/or mitigate these factors, thus breaking new ground for equitable Responsible Research and Innovation. This deliverable is structured as follows: Section 2 presents a systematic Scoping Review of current evidence on ON-MERRIT���s major focus of dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in Open Science, with reference to related factors in RRI. Section 3 presents an overview of the findings from ON-MERRIT���s research into research cultures, support and incentives (deriving mainly from Work Package 3), including reference to specific findings of relevance to ON-MERRIT���s target Sustainable Development Goals. Section 4 presents an overview of the findings from ON-MERRIT���s research into Innovation and industry (Work Package 4), including reference to specific findings of relevance to ON-MERRIT���s target SDGs. Section 5 presents an overview of the findings from ON-MERRIT���s research into Policy-making and societal actors (Work Package 5), including reference to specific findings of relevance to ON-MERRIT���s target SDGs. Section 6 presents findings from across the project on issues related to gender equity and the transition to Open Science and RRI. Section 7 concludes by reviewing key findings and relating this to the final tasks of ON-MERRIT to create policy recommendations.

Related Organizations
Keywords

open science, recommendations, research rewards and incentives

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 8
    download downloads 9
  • 8
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
8
9
Green