Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Thirty minutes identified as the threshold for development of pain in low back and feet regions, and predictors of intensity of pain during 1-hour laboratory-based standing in office workers.

Authors: Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero; Michelle D Smith; Sonia Pértega-Díaz; Alejandro Quintela-del-Río; Venerina;

Thirty minutes identified as the threshold for development of pain in low back and feet regions, and predictors of intensity of pain during 1-hour laboratory-based standing in office workers.

Abstract

This study with 40 office workers investigated a) the effect of time spent standing on low back and lower limb pain during 1-hour laboratory-based task; b) the minutes after which significant increase in pain are likely; and c) which individual, physical and psychosocial factors predicted pain. The primary outcome was bodily location of pain and intensity on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale recorded at baseline and every 15 minutes. Measurements included trunk and hip motor control and endurance. Self-report history of pain, physical activity, psychosocial job characteristics, pain catastrophizing and general health status were collected. Univariate analysis and regression models were included. The prevalence of low back pain increase from 15% to 40% after 30 minutes while feet pain increased to 25% from 0 at baseline. The intensity of low back and lower limb pain also increased over time. Thirty minutes was identified as the threshold for the development and increase in low back and feet pain. Modifiable factors were associated with low back pain intensity - lower hip abductor muscle endurance and poorer physical health and with feet symptoms - greater body mass index and less core stability

Related Organizations
Keywords

low back pain; standing position; musculoskeletal pain; lower extremity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average