Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lipophaga kraepelini Roewer 1933

Authors: Harms, Danilo; Dupérré, Nadine;

Lipophaga kraepelini Roewer 1933

Abstract

Lipophaga kraepelini Roewer 1933 Fig. 27 A –C Roewer 1933: 321, fig. 236k (as Lipophaga kraepelini nov. spec.) Type locality and specimens. nur ♀—Südwest-Afrika (Okahandja)—(vidi 1 ♀, Typus). Dimensions. Körperlänge 22 mm. [17.54; 22.10] Oldest label. Lipophaga cfr. michaelseni ♀ Kr (probably Kraepelin handwriting). Additional label 1. Mus. Hamburg. Lipophaga michaelseni, 1♀ — Typ. SW. Afr: Okahandja, Roewer revid. 1932 — No. 8505 (Roewer handwriting). Additional label 2. Hamb. dtsch-s.w. afr. Studienr. 1911. Okahandja. W. Michaelsen leg. 27.–28.IV.1911 (Printed label). Type material. Holotype ♀ (ZMH-A0000165). Taxonomic remarks. Roewer (1933:321) described this species in honor of Kraepelin (Lipophaga kraepelini) based on a single female previoulsy described under Lipophaga michaelseni (Kraepelin 1914). Kraepelin had mentioned earlier that it was questionable that the female belongs to the male of this species. The locality data originally presented (Kraepelin 1914) (Okahandja: W. Michaelsen, 27–28 April 1911) match the data on the locality label. There is a little confusion in the Roewer label; he wrote the wrong species name or forgot to change the label to his new species name. The locality data, the size and the cheliceral teeth match the data presented by Roewer and no other specimens could be found at the ZMB or SMF. Collection remarks. This specimen was collected during Wilhem Michaelsen’s zoological expedition in 1911; the third in a series of field expeditions and seeking to undertand zoogeographic patterns in southern South America (1892–93), South-West Australia (1905) and south-western Africa. Current systematic position. Gylippidae, Lipophaga kraepelini Roewer 1933.

Published as part of Harms, Danilo & Dupérré, Nadine, 2018, An annotated type catalogue of the camel spiders (Arachnida: Solifugae) held in the Zoological Museum Hamburg, pp. 1-58 in Zootaxa 4375 (1) on pages 47-49, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4375.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1158093

Keywords

Lipophaga, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Lipophaga kraepelini, Biodiversity, Solifugae, Gylippidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green