Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Icochilus ulter Ameghino 1899

Authors: Fernández, Mercedes; Fernicola, Juan Carlos; Cerdeño, Esperanza;

Icochilus ulter Ameghino 1899

Abstract

Icochilus ulter Ameghino, 1899 Holotype. MACN-A 11601 (Figs. 6 H–I), right mandibular fragment with p3–m3 and left mandibular fragment with p4–m1 series. Age and provenance of the type material. Astrapothericulan beds (presumably the Pinturas Formation), early Miocene, Santa Cruz Province (Argentina). Original description (Ameghino 1899: 5). “ De la talla del Icochilus extensus, pero de rama mandibular más alta (20 milímetros debajo de la quinta muela) ”. English translation. With the size of Icochilus extensus, but with a highest mandibular ramus (20 millimetres below the fifth molar). Comments. Ameghino (1899) briefly described this species without illustrating it, but he did not mention it in his catalogue. There is no specimen indicated as type of Ic. ulter in the Ameghino Collection. Despite this, Mones (1986) indicated, but with doubts, “MACN-A 10601?” as type specimen; however, this specimen is also indicated by the author as the type of the isotemnid Eochalicotherium crassidens. MACN-A 10601 is in fact a lot constituted by three mandibular fragments—with one tooth each—that belong to the latter species; consequently, it is discarded as the holotype of Ic. ulter. On the other hand, the lot MACN-A 11601, which is composed of two mandibular fragments of the same individual, with right p3–m3 and left p4–m1, is the only material assigned by F. Ameghino to Ic. ulter within the Ameghino Collection. The right fragment matches the only measurement (length of the mandibular ramus below m1 = 20 mm) given by Ameghino (1899). It is worth mentioning that there are two pieces of paper inside the container with Ameghino’s handwriting: one that reproduces the original description of the species and another with the name “ Icochilus ulter ”. In the latter, it is also written “10601” but with someone else’s handwriting (probably from M. Soria; A. Kramarz, pers. comm.), and the first ‘0’ was crossed out and replaced by ‘1’; it is very likely that this mistake led Mones to mention “MACN-A 10601?” as the type of the species. As a result, MACN-A 11601 is identified as the holotype of Ic. ulter.

Published as part of Fernández, Mercedes, Fernicola, Juan Carlos & Cerdeño, Esperanza, 2019, On the type materials of the genera Interatherium Ameghino, 1887 and Icochilus Ameghino, 1889 (Interatheriidae, Notoungulata, Mammalia) from early Miocene of the Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, pp. 195-220 in Zootaxa 4543 (2) on page 216, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4543.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/2617757

Keywords

Notoungulata, Mammalia, Animalia, Icochilus ulter, Biodiversity, Interatheriidae, Icochilus, Chordata, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green