
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Data and scripts required to replicate the analyses in Thia (2022) "Guidelines for standardising the application of discriminant analysis of principal components to genotype data" in Molecular Ecology. This study aimed to address methodological misunderstandings and misuse of the DAPC method in population genetics. The analyses are used to illustrate that for genotype data comprising k effective populations, there are only k−1 PC axes that describe populations structure, and that are biologically informative. These PC axes are the only suitable axes for modelling the among-population differences with a DA. Use of many more than k−1 PC axes leads to decreasing biological relevancy of the final DA solution, with implications for misinterpretations of population structure.
Metapopulations with different migrations rates and levels of genetic differentaition were simualted using fastsimcoal v2.7. Simulated individuals were imported into R v4.1.2 for further downstream analysis.
See the README for details on setting up computing environment, the working directory, and executing scripts.
population genetic methods, linear discriminant analysis, discriminant analysis of principal components, principal component analysis, population structure, coalescent simulations
population genetic methods, linear discriminant analysis, discriminant analysis of principal components, principal component analysis, population structure, coalescent simulations
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 8 | |
downloads | 3 |