Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Compsodactylus Fuhrmann 2012

Authors: Fuhrmann, Juares;

Compsodactylus Fuhrmann 2012

Abstract

Key to Compsodactylus species Modified from Fuhrmann 2012 and using data of Figueroa & Neita-Moreno 2019. Males do not have metatibiae spurs while females have two metatibial spurs (see remarks above). 1. Metafemur of males greatly widened and about three times wider than width of medial area of metatibia; females with gonostylus............................................................................................... 2 - Metafemur of males slightly widened and less than two times the width of the medial area of the metatibia (Figs. 12, 15); females without gonostylus............................................................................... 3 2. Pronotum and elytra with metallic green reflection; apex of protarsomere I of males slightly wider than apex of II, metatarsus of males somewhat moniliform; pygidium of males with scale-like setae; females with distal gonocoxite somewhat trapezoid or oval; Peru (Apurímac; Fig. 98).................................................... C. martinezi (Frey, 1972) - Dorsal surface without metallic green reflection; apex of protarsomere I of males twice wider than apex of II or almost so, metatarsus of males somewhat filiform; pygidium of males with hair-like setae; females with distal gonocoxite coma-like; Peru (La Libertad; Fig. 98)............................................... C. vallejoi Figueroa & Neita-Moreno, 2019 3. Elytral striae strongly and regularly punctate; metatibia of males gradually enlarged (Fig. 12); females with inner distal area of gonocoxite rounded; Argentina (Catamarca, Salta, Tucumán; Fig. 98)...................... C. argentinus (Moser, 1919) - Elytral striae shallowly and irregularly punctate; metatibia of males abruptly enlarged in proximal third (Fig. 15); females with inner distal area of gonocoxite straight; Bolivia (Cochabamba, Santa Cruz; Fig. 98).............. C. parvulus (Frey, 1970)

Published as part of Fuhrmann, Juares, 2019, Taxonomy of Neotropical genera Compsodactylus and Dasyus and notes on claw movement in Macrodactylini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae), pp. 139-163 in Zootaxa 4679 (1) on page 141, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4679.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/3466340

Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Compsodactylus, Melolonthidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green