Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Background:Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is an uncommon disease that is usually difficult to diagnose. Transthoracic echocardiography can sometimes fail to establish its diagnosis. The aim of our study is to prove that both Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offer distinct advantages to confirm the diagnosis of CP and make therapeutic decisions for patients with this condition. Methods:Data of 76 patients who underwent MRI for a suspicion of CP from January 2009 to October 2021 were reviewed retrospectively Results:MRI and CT scan confirmed the diagnosis showing pericardial thickening in all cases, measuring 7.6 ± 3.2 mm on average circumferential in 62,7 %, and localized in 37,3 %, pericardial calcification in 50 % of cases and inferior vena cava plethora in all cases. An abnormal septal motion was found in all patients. Imaging data namely pericardial thickening, calcifications, as well as their topography, were confirmed by surgical exploration, and the results were consistent in 100% of cases. Conclusion:Although cardiac CT and CMR are recommended as second-line tests in the diagnostic workup of constrictive pericarditis, they offer distinct advantages to not only confirm the diagnosis but also make therapeutic decisions for patients with this condition. Nowadays, many studies prove that a modern approach for the management of pericardial diseases should include the use of different imaging modalities.
Constrictive Pericarditis MRI CT
Constrictive Pericarditis MRI CT
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts