Views provided by UsageCounts
There has been a recent surge in methods that aim to decompose and segment scenes into multiple objects in an unsupervised manner, i.e., unsupervised multi-object segmentation. Performing such a task is a long-standing goal of computer vision, offering to unlock object-level reasoning without requiring dense annotations to train segmentation models. Despite significant progress, current models are developed and trained on visually simple scenes depicting mono-colored objects on plain backgrounds. The natural world, however, is visually complex with confounding aspects such as diverse textures and complicated lighting effects. In this study, we present a new benchmark called ClevrTex, designed as the next challenge to compare, evaluate and analyze algorithms. ClevrTex features synthetic scenes with diverse shapes, textures and photo-mapped materials, created using physically based rendering techniques. ClevrTex has 50k examples depicting 3-10 objects arranged on a background, created using a catalog of 60 materials, and a further test set featuring 10k images created using 25 different materials. We benchmark a large set of recent unsupervised multi-object segmentation models on ClevrTex and find all state-of-the-art approaches fail to learn good representations in the textured setting, despite impressive performance on simpler data. We also create variants of the ClevrTex dataset, controlling for different aspects of scene complexity, and probe current approaches for individual shortcomings. Project webpage: https://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/data/clevrtex/ These are the variant datasets. Please see project page for links to the main dataset.
multi-object, unsupervised segmentation, unsupervised, semantic segmentation, computer vision
multi-object, unsupervised segmentation, unsupervised, semantic segmentation, computer vision
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts