Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Clinical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Article . 2022
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Article . 2022
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Article . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Article . 2022
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

The prevalence of multiple drug resistance Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients with urinary tract infections

Authors: Mays B. Jalil; Mohammed Younus Naji Al Atbee;

The prevalence of multiple drug resistance Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients with urinary tract infections

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) and bacterial resistance to antibiotics is global health problem and a threat to public health in many countries.AimsThe study aimed to determine the prevalence of MDR Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in UTI patients.Materials & methodsThe midstream urine samples of 120 patients were collected and cultured as described by the protocols at the respective sample collection sites on MacConkey Blood agar. Samples were tested by using the fully automated VITEK 2 Compact system for Gram‐negative identification and detection of antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms.ResultsThe most prevalent pathogen was E. coli, which was found in 82 (68.3%) urine samples, followed by K. pneumonia, found in 38 (31.7%) urine samples. As far as antibiotic resistance is concerned, E. coli isolates were found to be highly resistant for ceftriaxone (89.0% of the isolates), ampicillin (86.6%), levofloxacin (82.9%), cefotaxime (79.3%), aztreonam (74.4%), ceftazidime (68.3%) and gentamicin, piperacillin, and trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, 54.9 and 53.7%, respectively. The E. coli isolates were found to be relatively less resistant to imipenem (2.4%), cefepime (34.1%), and ciprofloxacin (35.4%). For K. pneumonia isolates, high resistance rates were observed for piperacillin (81.6%), levofloxacin (78.9%), ampicillin (76.3%), cefotaxime (73.7%), trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole (71.1%), ceftazidime (65.8%), gentamicin (63.2%), cefepime (50.0%), and aztreonam (44.7%). However, moderate resistance rates were detected for these were found to be less resistant for imipenem (13.2%), ceftriaxone (31.6%), and ciprofloxacin (36.8%).ConclusionE. coli and K. pneumoniae from the clinical isolates displayed high resistance to many antibiotics in UTI patients.

Keywords

Piperacillin, Ceftriaxone, Levofloxacin, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Ceftazidime, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Klebsiella Infections, Aztreonam, Imipenem, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Ciprofloxacin, Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination, Escherichia coli, Prevalence, Humans, Ampicillin, Gentamicins, Cefepime, Research Articles, Escherichia coli Infections

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    63
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
  • 7
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
63
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%
7
Green
gold