Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D5.1: Evaluation and Impact Assessment Plan

Authors: Schäfer, Teresa; Fabian, Claudia Magdalena; Kieslinger, Barbara;

D5.1: Evaluation and Impact Assessment Plan

Abstract

The current document, titled “Evaluation and Impact Assessment Plan”, has been developed within the framework of the TIME4CS project, which is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No 101006201. In TIME4CS, evaluation is integrated in all project activities from the very beginning, it is understood as a form of participatory evaluation that initiates the conversation on expectations, objectives, and impact already at the start of the project. Consequently, WP5 has started the evaluation process with representatives from the four implementing organizations - CRG, KTU, UniSR and Tyndall - from the beginning of the project. A first exercise was to understand the current situation in these organizations - an initial stock-taking - where the evaluation team collected data on the implementers' current status of institutional support for citizen science (CS) in the four intervention areas. Only when the baseline is known before starting the design and implementation of the roadmaps and Grounding Actions, a proper evaluation of the project’s benefits and outcomes at the end is possible. To develop a set of indicators for institutional changes in RPOs towards more support of citizen science, WP5 closely cooperates with WP2 to accompany the development of roadmaps and Grounding Actions in the implementing organizations. These actions are expected to lead to the institutional changes in the implementing organizations and are assessed with regard to their usefulness and intermediate and long-term outcomes. Additionally, the evaluation team took a closer look at the framework for setting up and looking at the case studies analysis, which was developed in WP1 and fed the indicators of WP5. The outcome of this work is a set of indicators for institutional changes for each intervention area and a set of indicators that keep track of changes in individual participants, like researchers, management and students. Quantitative and qualitative instruments to collect data for these indicators are set up and will be more concretely elaborated and tested in cooperation with the implementing organizations and in parallel to the implementation of the Grounding Actions. A set of monitoring and reflection questions will be the focus of three-monthly monitoring meetings with implementers that help to learn from the implementation process and iteratively shape the developed trainings, workshops, documents, strategies, etc., developed by the project. Finally, a set of overall project key performance indicators (KPIs) is introduced together with their status when writing this deliverable.

Keywords

impact assessment, evaluation, citizen science, indicators

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 44
    download downloads 40
  • 44
    views
    40
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
44
40
Green