Views provided by UsageCounts
This dataset contains the original data to the manuscript The effect of personalised versus non-personalised study invitations on recruitment: An embedded randomised controlled recruitment trial. The study is registered in the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN18404129) and the Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT repository (SWAT 112). A full protocol for the study has been published: Woodford J, Norbäck K, Hagström J, Grönqvist H, Parker A, Arundel C, et al. Study within a trial (SWAT) protocol. Investigating the effect of personalised versus non-personalised study invitations on recruitment: an embedded randomised controlled recruitment trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020; doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100572
Recruitment, Retention, Study invitation, Study Within A Trial, Trial methodology, Randomised controlled trial
Recruitment, Retention, Study invitation, Study Within A Trial, Trial methodology, Randomised controlled trial
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts