Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Saxetania Mistshenko 1951

Authors: Ünal, Mustafa;

Saxetania Mistshenko 1951

Abstract

Genus: Saxetania Mistshenko, 1951 s.l. Mistshenko, 1951b: 738. Type species: Saxetania decumana Mistshenko, 1951. Remarks. This genus was established by Mistshenko (1951b: 738) by the shape of frontal ridge, the vertex and hind femur. Dirsh (1952: 95, 97) explaining in detail synonymized it with Tropidauchen, but Bey-Bienko & Mistshenko (1951: 332), Mirzayans (1959: 15), Shumakov (1963: 47), Bey-Bienko (1963: 268), Bey-Bienko (1967: 427), Descamps (1967: 28), Cejchan (1969: 233), Presa & Garcia (1983: 29), Otte (1994: 187) and Hodjat (2012: 262, 264, 266) gave Saxetania as a valid genus. Only Mirzayans (1998) listed some species of Saxetania under Tropidauchen. Bey-Bienko & Richter (1960: 9) reported it as a subgenus of Tropidauchen for the first time, but Bey-Bienko (1963, 1967) gave it as an independent genus again. Hodjat (2012) compared both genera and considered them valid. It is not always easy to distinguish both genera using the external structures. As given by Dirsh (1952) some species have interstage characters. On the other hand the male genitalia allow to easily distinguish both genera, mainly the structure of apical valves of penis, which is very distinctive, very large and not covered by the sheath of penis in Saxetania (Figs. 39 a–41a) (small, thin and covered by the sheath of penis in Tropidauchen) (Fig. 38 a). The male genitalia of all known species and subspecies of both genera should be checked to determine the correct genus.

Published as part of Ünal, Mustafa, 2016, Pamphagidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) from the Palaearctic Region: taxonomy, classification, keys to genera and a review of the tribe Nocarodeini I. Bolívar, pp. 1-223 in Zootaxa 4206 (1) on page 85, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4206.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/208260

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Pamphagidae, Animalia, Orthoptera, Biodiversity, Saxetania, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2