Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Scholarly Communication is still shifting from papers to richer content, as for instance research data and code. Data dissemination has a crucial role and yet it is in its infancy, with visible fragmentation and too many unknowns for researchers to get onboard. With our work, we want to mitigate this situation and help researchers decide which platforms are best suited to disseminate their data and code. The table we elaborated is based on multiple feedback from EPFL researchers, and its purpose is both to capture the variety of use-cases, and to guide researchers to make their choice. This poster is principally conceived for colleagues working in university services related to Open Science and Research Data Management, to provide them with an example of collaboration that might be reproduced in their institutions, and to create awareness on the challenges that such an endeavor entails. In this publication, we also include the current version of the comparative table of data dissemination solutions.
Data repositories, Open Data, University services, Online platform, Dissemination, Collaboration, Comparative table
Data repositories, Open Data, University services, Online platform, Dissemination, Collaboration, Comparative table
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 50 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts