Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is one of the main enablers behind the promised improvements in the Fifth Generation (5G) networking era. Thanks to this concept, Network Functions (NFs) are evolving into software components (e.g., Virtual Network Functions (VNFs)) that can be deployed in general-purpose servers following a cloud-based approach. In this way, NFs can be deployed at scale, fulfilling a great variety of service requirements. Unfortunately, the complexity in the management and orchestration of NFV-based networks has increased due to the diverse demands from a growing number of network services. Such complexity calls for an automated and autonomous solution that self adapts to the needs of those network services. In this paper, we propose and compare a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agent, a classical Proportional–Integral–Derivative (PID) controller, and a Threshold (THD)-based algorithm for autonomously determining the amount of VNF instances to fulfill a service latency requirement without knowing or predicting the expected demand. Finally, we present a comparison of the three approaches in terms of created VNFs and peak latency performed in a discrete event simulator.
This research was partially funded by Ctrl App, a research project of the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) under grant agreement No. G055619N, and by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 101017109 (DAEMON).
Artificial intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Latency (audio), Visual arts, PID Controller, Network Virtualization, Engineering, Server, Reinforcement learning, Cloud computing, Software-defined networking, Network Function Virtualization, Computer. Automation, Computer network, Machine Learning for Networking, Orchestration, Software-Defined Networking and Network Virtualization, Security Challenges in Smart Grid Systems, Computer science, Reinforcement Learning, Software-Defined Networking, Distributed computing, Virtual Network Embedding, Operating system, Auto-scaling, Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Network Intrusion Detection and Defense Mechanisms, Telecommunications, Musical, Network Functions Virtualization, Beyond 5G, Art
Artificial intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Latency (audio), Visual arts, PID Controller, Network Virtualization, Engineering, Server, Reinforcement learning, Cloud computing, Software-defined networking, Network Function Virtualization, Computer. Automation, Computer network, Machine Learning for Networking, Orchestration, Software-Defined Networking and Network Virtualization, Security Challenges in Smart Grid Systems, Computer science, Reinforcement Learning, Software-Defined Networking, Distributed computing, Virtual Network Embedding, Operating system, Auto-scaling, Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Network Intrusion Detection and Defense Mechanisms, Telecommunications, Musical, Network Functions Virtualization, Beyond 5G, Art
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 13 | |
| downloads | 17 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts