Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Next-Gen Manuscript Descriptions: A Case for the Reconsideration of the Manuscript Description Module of the TEI Guidelines

Authors: Kapitan, Katarzyna Anna; Yavuz, N. Kıvılcım;

Next-Gen Manuscript Descriptions: A Case for the Reconsideration of the Manuscript Description Module of the TEI Guidelines

Abstract

Abstract The application of TEI-XML in manuscript studies has increased dramatically in recent years, as attested by projects such as the Virtual Manuscript Library of Switzerland, Digital Catalogue of Medieval and Early Modern Manuscripts in Sweden and the renewed manuscript catalogue of the Bodleian Libraries. This creates a need for training on and tutorials and resources for the TEI msDesc module, including examples of best practices. While there are detailed examples for msContents as part of the Guidelines and elsewhere, the physDesc as well as history and additional information are not as developed nor detailed. Although general outlines for these elements are provided as part of the msDesc module of the Guidelines, and ENRICH and MASTERS projects advanced significantly the application of TEI in manuscript studies, recently SIGs have been focusing mostly on digital editions and publishing. Furthermore, at several points the Guidelines assume that the information that will be encoded already exists and leaves it up to the encoder whether it should be “marked up simply as a series of p elements.” Such a description, however, will not allow one to apply digital tools and methods for the extraction and analysis of information in order to ask and answer new research questions. Drawing on our experiences in teaching TEI-XML to manuscript scholars, we propose to create a new SIG devoted specifically to manuscript descriptions, focusing especially on 10.7 Physical Description, 10.8 History and 10.9 Additional Information of the TEI Guidelines. We suggest reconsidering existing elements and expanding these sections as necessary by creating new elements and attributes with examples. We believe these can then be easily incorporated by manuscript cataloguers as well as in teaching programs, especially if there are freely available XSLT for conversion into HTML and data extraction, as well as a basic schema.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Digital Manuscript Studies, Manuscript Studies, Manuscript Metadata, Manuscript Descriptions, Text Encoding Initiative, TEI, Manuscripts, Book History

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 43
    download downloads 32
  • 43
    views
    32
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
43
32
Green
Related to Research communities