Views provided by UsageCounts
Fig. 6. The results of AMOVA computed on the genetic data and hierarchical ANOVA of the morphometric data. A = AMOVA of both regions together. B = AMOVA of the two regions separately. C = Hierarchical ANOVA of both regions together. D = Hierarchical ANOVA of the two regions separately. The patterns of the columns are consistent in all charts. BR: between region component of variance (dark grey); BP: variation among the populations within the regions (black); BS: variation among the samples/generations within the populations (white); WS: within sample compo-
Published as part of Hollós, A., Pecsenye, K., Bereczki, J., Bátori, E., Rákosy, L. & Varga, Z., 2012, Pattern Of Genetic And Morphometric Differentiation In Maculinea Nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) In The Carpathian Basin, pp. 87-103 in Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 58 (1) on page 96, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5735675
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts