Views provided by UsageCounts
FIGURE 4. Comparison of relationships proposed by previous researchers and this study. The top two branching diagrams were drawn by hand based on published texts. Groups of genera are shaded to facilitate comparison, and genera in open boxes are no longer considered members of Amathusiini sensu Chazot et al. (2021). Note that those authors used the genus name Morphotenaris Fruhstorfer, which was synonymized with Taenaris by Stichel (1933).
Published as part of Penz, Carla M., 2021, Phylogeny of Amathusiini butterflies based on adult morphology (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae), pp. 151-186 in Zootaxa 5067 (2) on page 162, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5067.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5677679
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts