Views provided by UsageCounts
Figure 4 | Map (a) and cluster analysis (b) showing phylogenetic similarity relationships among centres of endemism for Australian Acacia. The cluster analysis used PD-dissimilarity and a phylo-jaccard metric with link-average linkage. Areas that cluster closely, indicating that they share many branches of their phylogenetic subtrees, are shown in the same colour and lettered for reference in the text. The number given by each letter is the proportion of grid cells in that cluster that are at least partly covered by currently protected areas; Eand F, the most poorly protected, are marked with an asterisk. The arrows on the map point to the grid cells in clusters Eand F that lie completely outside of protected areas and are thus of highest conservation concern.
Published as part of Mishler, Brent D., Knerr, Nunzio, González-Orozco, Carlos E., Thornhill, Andrew H., Laffan, Shawn W. & Miller, Joseph T., 2014, Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity and neo- and paleo-endemism in Australian Acacia, pp. 4473 in Nature Communications 5 on page 6, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5473, http://zenodo.org/record/5647441
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts