Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah-711 103, West Bengal, India E-mail: sgcoolspandan@gmail.com Manuscript received online 28 January 2019, accepted 25 March 2019 Industrial wastewater contains heavy metals like arsenic which may enter into the food chain and may affect human beings. In this study As(V) removal was done by GO and fRGO and a comparative study was made. At equilibrium pH (pH 6) fRGO gives more As(V) removal than GO. For both the materials, Langmuir adsorption isotherm fit better than Freundlich isotherm. The adsorption capacities of GO and fRGO are determined (12.04 mg/g) and (28.57 mg/g) respectively. Both materials follow pseudo-second order removal kinetics and fRGO (0.09 g/mg/min) shows a faster removal rate than GO (0.07 g/mg/min). It was found that fRGO can remove 2.4 times more arsenic than graphene oxide (GO).
adsorption, GO, fRGO, comparative study, Arsenic
adsorption, GO, fRGO, comparative study, Arsenic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts