Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Whittingtonocotyle jeju Neto, Rodrigues & Domingues, 2015, n. sp.

Authors: Santos Neto, João F.; Rodrigues, Allan R. O.; Domingues, Marcus V.;

Whittingtonocotyle jeju Neto, Rodrigues & Domingues, 2015, n. sp.

Abstract

Whittingtonocotyle jeju n. sp. (Figs. 10–18) Type host. Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus. Site. Gills Type locality. Guamá River, municipality of Irituia, Pará State, Brazil (01°51’59.8” S, 47°24’17.2”W) collected in July 2014. Other records. Caeté River, municipality of Augusto Corrêa, Pará State, Brazil (1°3’58.21” S 46°40’3.65”W) collected in October 2013. Prevalence. 66% of 3 hosts examined. Mean intensity. 9 parasites per infected host. Specimens deposited. Holotype, CHIOC 38014a; 6 paratypes, CHIOC 38014b–e, INPA 659, MPEG 00042; 7 vouchers, CHIOC 38015a–d, INPA 660, MPEG 00043. Etymology. The specific name is derived from the local name of the host. Comparative measurements. Table 2. Description (based on 7 specimens; 5 mounted in Gomori’s trichrome, 2 mounted in Hoyer’ medium): Body fusiform. Cephalic margin tapered; cephalic lobes inconspicuous; 4–5 pairs of head organs with rod-shaped secretion; cephalic glands lateral or postero-lateral to pharynx. Eyes 4, posterior pair larger and slightly farther apart than anterior pair; accessory granules absent in the cephalic area. Pharynx muscular, ovate. Male copulatory organ, with approximately 19 rings, base with sclerotized cap (Fig. 11). Accessory piece, a variable sheath, enclosing some distal rings of MCO. Testis subspherical, vas deferens conspicuous; seminal vesicle sigmoid; prostatic reservoir large, bacilliform separated into three zones with two terminal areas densely stained. Germarium subovate; oviduct, ootype, Mehlis’ glands, uterus not observed. Vagina comprising vaginal vestibule with soft tissue, vaginal canal heavily sclerotized, sigmoid. Seminal receptacle pyriform. Peduncle short; pair of haptor glands starting at level of peduncle, convolute at distal portion, ending at level of the anchor/bar complexes (Fig. 10). Haptor subtrapezoidal. Anchors similar, with broad base, poorly developed roots, short shaft. Ventral anchor (Fig. 16) with superficial root depressed covered by sclerotized cap; deep root short covered by sclerotized cap on outer proximal portion; evenly curved shaft, point. Dorsal anchor (Fig. 15) with superficial root broad covered by sclerotized cap; deep root short covered by sclerotized cap; evenly curved shaft, point. Ventral bar (Fig. 17), curved with tapered ends. Dorsal bar (Fig. 18), straight, with short anteromedial process, 1/3 dorsal bar length. Hooks similar (Figs. 13–14); each with delicate point and shaft, slightly erect thumb, elongate straight shank, short point; FH loop not observed; hook pair 1 smaller than hook pairs 2–7. Remarks. This species differs from Whittingtonocotyle caetei n. sp. by the morphology of the anchors, and by possessing a male copulatory organ comprising a coil of about 19 rings (29 rings in W. caetei n. sp.), a prostatic reservoir separated into three zones with two terminal areas densely stained (two zones with one terminal areas densely stained in W. caetei n. sp.), vaginal canal sigmoid (coiled in W. caetei n. sp.), and a dorsal bar with short anteromedial process (elongate in W. caetei n. sp.).

Published as part of Santos Neto, João F., Rodrigues, Allan R. O. & Domingues, Marcus V., 2015, Proposal of Whittingtonocotyle n. gen. (Dactylogyroidea: Dactylogyridae), with the description of two new species from the gills of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus (Characiformes: Erythrinidae) in Brazil, pp. 191-200 in Zootaxa 3937 (1) on page 196, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3937.1.10, http://zenodo.org/record/234091

Keywords

Monogenoidea, Animalia, Whittingtonocotyle, Biodiversity, Dactylogyridae, Whittingtonocotyle jeju, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2