Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2012
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2012
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2012
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Strigamia crassipes C.L. Koch 1835

Authors: Bonato, Lucio; Dányi, László; Socci, Antonio Augusto; Minelli, Alessandro;

Strigamia crassipes C.L. Koch 1835

Abstract

Strigamia crassipes (C.L. Koch, 1835) Synonyms: Geophilus breviceps Newport, 1845; Geophilus anauniensis Fedrizzi, 1876; Scolioplanes mediterraneus Verhoeff, 1928; Scolioplanes tauerorum Verhoeff, 1940. Nominal subspecies: S. crassipes carniolensis (Verhoeff, 1895); S. crassipes alsatica (Verhoeff, 1928); S. crassipes carynthiaca (Verhoeff, 1928); S. crassipes longaronensis (Verhoeff, 1935); S. crassipes pegliensis (Verhoeff, 1935); S. crassipes faitana (Verhoeff, 1943). References for morphology: Verhoeff 1928, 1935; Brolemann 1930 (sub Scolioplanes acuminatus, in part); Machado 1952; Eason 1964; Matic 1972; Koren, 1986; Iorio 2004, 2005; Barber 2008, 2009a. Taxonomic notes. Described originally as a species of Geophilus, it was cited for a long time under either Linotaenia or Scolioplanes, until its classification in Strigamia was established gradually since Crabill (1953). Despite the fact that S. crassipes and S. acuminata are obviously different in major features including the number of trunk segments (Table 1), some confusion arose in the past: C.L. Koch (1837) misidentified a female S. acuminata as a S. crassipes, as recognized by Bergsøe & Meinert (1866) and subsequent authors; Verhoeff (1895) merged the two species into a single variable species, which he named Scolioplanes variabilis (see above under S. acuminata), a treatment that was later abandoned by the same author; S. crassipes was occasionally treated as a subspecies of S. acuminata (Verhoeff 1898; Machado 1952), and Brolemann (1930) explicitly synonymized S. crassipes under S. acuminata. Different subspecies and varieties were distinguished under S. crassipes or its synonyms (Verhoeff 1935), which created a complex intraspecific taxonomy including many infrasubspecific entities (see below under “Unavailable names”). Some of these infraspecific taxa have been cited occasionally also recently, but most of them have been ignored. Geophilus breviceps and Geophilus anauniensis are regarded confidently as synonyms of S. crassipes since Latzel (1880), and Scolioplanes tauerorum since Schubart (1967). Scolioplanes mediterraneus was described by Verhoeff (1928) and further specimens were referred later to it. The species was treated subsequently by the same author as either a variety or a subspecies of S. crassipes (Verhoeff 1935, 1940). It was maintained only occasionally as valid (Folkmanová 1952; Jeekel 1964a), but most authors ignored it, without discussing its true identity. We consider here S. mediterraneus to be a synonym of S. crassipes (new synonymy) because Verhoeff (1928, 1934, 1935) acknowledged that it agrees almost completely with typical S. crassipes, the only difference being in the relative size of the coxal pores in comparison to their ducts; however, this is probably a variable character without taxonomic value (our obs.); additionally, the same author later treated it as a mere variety of S. crassipes (Verhoeff 1935). Distribution: most part of continental Europe, from the Iberian peninsula to eastern Europe; also in the British Isles and the Azores.

Published as part of Bonato, Lucio, Dányi, László, Socci, Antonio Augusto & Minelli, Alessandro, 2012, Species diversity of Strigamia Gray, 1843 (Chilopoda: Linotaeniidae): a preliminary synthesis, pp. 1-39 in Zootaxa 3593 on pages 12-13, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.214898

Keywords

Geophilomorpha, Strigamia, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Strigamia crassipes, Chilopoda, Linotaeniidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
  • 4
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
Green