Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Development of the Autonomous Technologies in Nursing Practice Scale: Preliminary Results

Authors: Olga Lezhnina; Johanna Mink; Gábor Kismihók; Adrienn Siket; Ádám Keszler; Miklós Zrínyi; Stefan Mol; +2 Authors

Development of the Autonomous Technologies in Nursing Practice Scale: Preliminary Results

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the study was to develop and psychometrically test the Autonomous Technologies in Nursing Practice scale for measuring self-assessed ability of nurses to deal with autonomous technologies in nursing practice. Design: Cross-sectional survey design was used for data collection. Methods: Item generation and selection was conducted based on cultural decentring principle by nursing experts in Germany, Hungary, and the Netherlands. The data was collected in Germany (n = 104) in June 2020 and Hungary (n = 700) in November 2019 - January 2020, the participants were nurses and nursing undergraduates. The best functioning items were selected in the process of item analysis and differential item functioning analysis, and psychometric properties of the resulting scale were evaluated. Results: The resulting scale is a 16-item unidimensional instrument demonstrating good item functioning, homogeneity and internal consistency reliability. Conclusion: The current version of the scale, which showed good psychometric properties, can be used by nursing professionals to evaluate their self-assessed ability to deal with autonomous technologies in nursing practice, or can be further developed by researchers. Impact: This study addresses the problem of lack of psychometric instruments evaluating self-assessed ability of nurses to deal with autonomous technologies. A unidimensional scale, the Autonomous Technologies in Nursing Practice scale, was developed and psychometrically tested by the authors. The scale can be useful for nursing professionals, while researchers might benefit from our data analytic procedures outlined in the text and in our freely available R script.

Co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union. NursingAI project id: 2018-1-DE02-KA202-005101

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 23
    download downloads 15
  • 23
    views
    15
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
23
15
Green