Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 36180441
pmc: PMC9525592
AbstractCommunity-developed minimum information checklists are designed to drive the rich and consistent reporting of metadata, underpinning the reproducibility and reuse of the data. These reporting guidelines, however, are usually in the form of narratives intended for human consumption. Modular and reusable machine-readable versions are also needed. Firstly, to provide the necessary quantitative and verifiable measures of the degree to which the metadata descriptors meet these community requirements, a requirement of the FAIR Principles. Secondly, to encourage the creation of standards-driven templates for metadata authoring, especially when describing complex experiments that require multiple reporting guidelines to be used in combination or extended. We present new functionalities to support the creation and improvements of machine-readable models. We apply the approach to an exemplar set of reporting guidelines in Life Science and discuss the challenges. Our work, targeted to developers of standards and those familiar with standards, promotes the concept of compositional metadata elements and encourages the creation of community-standards which are modular and interoperable from the onset.
Metadata, Science, Q, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, FAIR, standards, Metadata, Data Management, FAIRsharing, JSON, http://edamontology.org/topic_3071, Article, Biological Science Disciplines
Metadata, Science, Q, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, FAIR, standards, Metadata, Data Management, FAIRsharing, JSON, http://edamontology.org/topic_3071, Article, Biological Science Disciplines
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 13 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts