Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2002
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2002
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2002
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Diplodinium cameli var. cameli Dogiel 1926

Authors: Kubesy, A. A.; Dehority, Burk A.;

Diplodinium cameli var. cameli Dogiel 1926

Abstract

Diplodinium cameli f. cameli Dogiel, 1926. (Fig. 1) Body is ellipsoidal and laterally compressed; prominent operculum; very small caudal lobe on ventral side. Measurements for the organisms in this material identified as D. cameli f. cameli were as follows (mean ± Standard error in m): L= 208.5 ± 3.5 (184­243); W= 140.4 ± 2.5 (119­164); L/W= 1.5 (1.4­1.7). Values are from the measurements of 25 cells. In the original description of this species by Dogiel (1926), he listed the following measurements (in m): L= 195 (160­210); W= 112 (92­130); L/W= 1.7. Morphology of the Diplodinium cameli f. cameli cells in the present study was similar to the description given by Dogiel; however, the cells were slightly longer and considerably wider, resulting in a lower L/W ratio. Several of the cells identified as Diplodinium cameli in this study possessed lateral spines, which have not been previously reported for this species. Two different forms were observed, one with a single spine on the dorsal side near the posterior end and the other with spines on both sides. These forms are described below:

Published as part of Kubesy, A. A. & Dehority, Burk A., 2002, Forestomach ciliate Protozoa in Egyptian dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius), pp. 1-12 in Zootaxa 51 on pages 7-8, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.155871

Keywords

Blepharocorythidae, Diplodinium, Trichostomatida, Kinetofragminophora, Biodiversity, Protozoa, Ciliophora, Diplodinium cameli, Diplodinium cameli f. cameli dogiel, 1926, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3