Views provided by UsageCounts
Diplodinium cameli f. cameli Dogiel, 1926. (Fig. 1) Body is ellipsoidal and laterally compressed; prominent operculum; very small caudal lobe on ventral side. Measurements for the organisms in this material identified as D. cameli f. cameli were as follows (mean ± Standard error in m): L= 208.5 ± 3.5 (184243); W= 140.4 ± 2.5 (119164); L/W= 1.5 (1.41.7). Values are from the measurements of 25 cells. In the original description of this species by Dogiel (1926), he listed the following measurements (in m): L= 195 (160210); W= 112 (92130); L/W= 1.7. Morphology of the Diplodinium cameli f. cameli cells in the present study was similar to the description given by Dogiel; however, the cells were slightly longer and considerably wider, resulting in a lower L/W ratio. Several of the cells identified as Diplodinium cameli in this study possessed lateral spines, which have not been previously reported for this species. Two different forms were observed, one with a single spine on the dorsal side near the posterior end and the other with spines on both sides. These forms are described below:
Published as part of Kubesy, A. A. & Dehority, Burk A., 2002, Forestomach ciliate Protozoa in Egyptian dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius), pp. 1-12 in Zootaxa 51 on pages 7-8, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.155871
Blepharocorythidae, Diplodinium, Trichostomatida, Kinetofragminophora, Biodiversity, Protozoa, Ciliophora, Diplodinium cameli, Diplodinium cameli f. cameli dogiel, 1926, Taxonomy
Blepharocorythidae, Diplodinium, Trichostomatida, Kinetofragminophora, Biodiversity, Protozoa, Ciliophora, Diplodinium cameli, Diplodinium cameli f. cameli dogiel, 1926, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts