Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Value of e-IRG and prospect

Authors: Budroni, Paolo; Holmgren, Sverker; van Rijn, Arjen; Pagaime, Joao; Bonac, Marko; von Voigt, Gabriele; Wiebelitz, Jan; +2 Authors

Value of e-IRG and prospect

Abstract

Recalling the work of the e-Infrastructure Reflection Group (e-IRG) on the e-Infrastructure Commons based on the “e-IRG Roadmap 2012”, the “e-IRG White Paper 2013”, and the “Marketplace for e-Infrastructure Services” document which paved the way to the establishment of European Open Science Cloud (EOSC); the e-IRG Roadmap 2016,5 defining a clear route on how to evolve the European e- Infrastructure ecosystem, with clear recommendations to all related stakeholders including the national governments and funding agencies, which also contributed to further evolution of the EOSC concept; the e-IRG response to the EOSC Staff Working Document (SWD) in 2018; and the May 2018 Council Conclusions on EOSC6 that encouraged Member States to “get organized so as to prepare them for the connection to EOSC” and called on “the Commission to make optimal use of ongoing projects, existing expertise and knowledge available via existing initiatives, such as ESFRI, eIRG, GO FAIR and others”, which resulted in the e-IRG National Nodes document7,8 ”National Nodes - Getting organised; how far are we?” in May 2019; the work of e-IRG providing guidance and advice on the electronic needs to the ESFRI Roadmaps’ proposers through dedicated documents and guides. Reaffirming the autonomy, neutrality and openness of e-IRG as advisory body for the EC, the Member States and Associated Countries, in the whole spectrum of e-Infrastructures, comprising EOSC, HPC/EuroHPC, network, data and connected services, addressing short-term aspects, but also facilitating discussions and reflections on long-term aspects in the e-Infrastructure area, providing a platform for all stakeholders to debate their views, and offer perspectives, analyse and propose approaches and consolidate ways forward.

Keywords

e-IRG, e-Infrastructure Reflection Group, e-Infrastructure Commons, Horizon Europe, EOSC, European Open Science Cloud

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 12
    download downloads 24
  • 12
    views
    24
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
12
24
Green