Views provided by UsageCounts
Here, we provide the selected fields used in our study, Quantifying Carbon Cycle Extremes and Attributing Their Causes Under Climate and Land Use & Land Cover Change from 1850 to 2300 (in review), from CESM1(BGC) fully-coupled runs from 1850 to 2300, comprising of historical (1850-2005), Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 (2005-2100), and Extension Concentration Pathway 8.5 (2101-2300). In these simulations, land and ocean biogeochemical processes experienced the same trajectory of increasing atmospheric CO2. The ensemble member that has constant plant functional type (PFT) distribution has "pftcon" in the file name; the other simulations have dynamic LULCC forcing. Fore more information of the comparison between simulations with LULCC and without LULCC of CESM1(BGC), please see Mahowald et. al. (2017). We acknowledge and thank the Community Earth System Model (CESM) Biogeochemistry Working Group (BGCWG) for performing the CESM1(BGC) simulations. DOI for related CESM1(BGC) simulations: https://doi.org/10.5065/D6BC3X8Q Related article : J. T. Randerson, et al., 2015: Multi-century changes in ocean and land contributions to climate-carbon feedbacks, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 29, 744-759, doi:10.1002/2014GB005079 Mahowald, N. M., Randerson, J. T., Lindsay, K., Munoz, E., Doney, S. C., Lawrence, P., Schlunegger, S., Ward, D. S., Lawrence, D., and Hoffman, F. M. (2017), Interactions between land use change and carbon cycle feedbacks, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 31, 96– 113, doi:10.1002/2016GB005374 Sharma, B., Kumar, J., Collier, N., Ganguly, A. R., & Hoffman, F. M. (2022). Quantifying carbon cycle extremes and attributing their causes under climate and land use and land cover change from 1850 to 2300. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 127, e2021JG006738. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006738
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts