Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Liriomyza bioassay methodology database

Authors: ELISABETE ALBUQUERQUE DOS SANTOS; HERBERT ÁLVARO ABREU DE SIQUEIRA; ELTON LÚCIO DE ARAÚJO; LÍLIAN MARIA DA SOLEDADE RIBEIRO; KEYLA WALESCKA LOPES DA SILVA;

Liriomyza bioassay methodology database

Abstract

ABSTRACT – Liriomyza sativae infestations cause economic losses of up to 30% in horticulture like melons and tomatoes, usually controlled with insecticides. Despite the high risk of evolution of resistance, rare are the works seeking to establish a standardization in the bioassay methodology that detects L. sativae resistance to insecticides. In this way, this work improved existing bioassay methodologies for larvae of L. sativae, seeking to standardize and make it possible to obtain more consistent data on susceptibility. Two populations of L. sativae were evaluated with insecticides by immersing leaf discs (2 cm in diameter) of melon and pork beans. Treated leaf discs containing a larva were transferred to trays (Bioassay tray) and acrylic plates. Bioassays were evaluated after 48 and 72 hours of exposure. The susceptibility parameters varied with exposure, type of arena and host, as well as the mode of action of the insecticides. Bioassays in the Bioassay tray provided greater homogeneity of response compared to acrylic plates. The response concentration curves were more accurate and homogeneous with melon leaves compared to pig bean leaves, presenting LC values well below these latter. Although the two methodologies can be used for toxicological bioassays, however, the use of Bioassay tray showed less economic cost and greater agility in the elaboration. Therefore, the enhancement toxicological bioassay methodology is suggested for Liriomyza species that provides more reproducible and less heterogeneous results, enabling research on susceptibility and monitoring of resistance to insecticides.

Keywords

bioassay, Standardization, insecticides, mining fly, susceptibility

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 5
    download downloads 56
  • 5
    views
    56
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
5
56