Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ICDAR 2017 Competition on the Classification of Medieval Handwritings in Latin Script - Dataset

Authors: Stutzmann, Dominique; Helias-Baron, Marlène;

ICDAR 2017 Competition on the Classification of Medieval Handwritings in Latin Script - Dataset

Abstract

The ICDAR2017 Competition on the Classification of Medieval Handwritings in Latin Script (CLaMM), jointly organized by Computer Scientists and Humanists (paleographers) followed a competition at ICFHR2016 and provided a rich annotated database of European medieval manuscripts to the community on Handwriting Analysis and Recognition, containing information on date of production and class of script. If you use this upload, please cite: Florence Cloppet, Véronique Eglin, Marlène Helias-Baron, van Cuong Kieu, Dominique Stutzmann, Nicole Vincent, "ICDAR 2017 Competition on the Classification of Medieval Handwritings in Latin Script", in 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. ICDAR 2017, 1371-76. Kyoto: CPS, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.224 We proposed four independent classification tasks which attracted 10 registered teams, with 6 submitted classifiers from 4 participants. Those classifiers are trained on a set of 3540 images with their ground truths. In task 1 (Script classification) and task 3 (Date classification), the classifiers have been evaluated by a test set of 2000 greyscale, tiff, 300 dpi images. In task 2 (Script classification) and task 4 (Date classification), the test set consists of 1000 images in different formats, resolutions and color representation. The present dataset contains the training dataset, both test datasets (tasks 1 and 3, and tasks 2 and 4) and the matrices provided by the competitors. It was first published on https://clamm.irht.cnrs.fr/icdar-2017/ in Nov. 2017.

{"references": ["Florence Cloppet, V\u00e9ronique Eglin, Marl\u00e8ne Helias-Baron, van Cuong Kieu, Dominique Stutzmann, Nicole Vincent, \"ICDAR 2017 Competition on the Classification of Medieval Handwritings in Latin Script\", in 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. ICDAR 2017, 1371-76. Kyoto: CPS, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.224"]}

Keywords

Image classification, Character recognition, Feature extraction, Medieval Latin script classification, Historical documents, Quantitative analysis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 16
    download downloads 23
  • 16
    views
    23
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
16
23