Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

TRIFoRM Final Report: TRust in IT: Factors, metRics, Models

Authors: Hooper, Clare; Pickering, Brian; Prichard, Jane; Ashleigh, Melanie;

TRIFoRM Final Report: TRust in IT: Factors, metRics, Models

Abstract

TRIFoRM brought together computer science, health science, social science and engineering to explore the trusting beliefs of users of IT systems, looking at factors that influence individual trust of systems and ways to model those factors and trust levels. The TRIFoRM team, based across three different faculties at the University of Southampton, focused particularly on healthcare technologies for monitoring chronic conditions. During the project, the team brought together existing theoretical work on trust, before interviewing people who may use or provide healthcare monitoring technology to understand what was important to them as individuals. Analysis of the interviews let the team identify possible threats to trust of the technology and controls to mitigate those threats. Two major threats were identified. The first is User Disengagement – if the medical team don’t adopt the technology, then patients will lose interest in that technology. The second is an Unusable System – causing all users, clinicians as well as patients, to lose interest and disengage. User Disengagement can be mitigated with appropriate training and support; Unusable System can be helped with appropriate design expertise. The team also identified two key issues. Firstly, it is clear that people using a monitoring technology to manage pain are more likely to take risks and tolerate faults: this means that those people are more vulnerable than otherwise. This has clear implications for the need to be cognisant of user motivation and application domain when designing this kind of system. The second issue is the importance of relationships. The people we interviewed who might use monitoring technology were concerned about whether such technology might change their relationship with healthcare providers, as well as with whether healthcare providers themselves trust the technology.

This is a report submitted as an IT as a Utility Network+ working paper

Related Organizations
Keywords

Technology acceptance, Trust in technology, Qualitative methods, Rheumatoid arthritis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 2
  • 3
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
2
Green