Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The environmental pollution in the Niger Delta has been a course of concern. Microorganisms such as bacteria have proved to be of great benefit in the degradation of petroleum derived hydrocarbons. This study evaluated the bacteriological and heavy metal concentration of abandoned crude oil–contaminated sites in Gio community, Ogoniland, Nigeria. Soil, water, and sediment samples were collected from the sites. pH and selected heavy metals in the samples were monitored. Isolation and biochemical characterization were done to determine the heterotrophic and hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria present in the samples. Soil and sediment samples had pH values of 4.80±0.04 and 4.8±0.07 respectively while the surface and ground water samples had pH values of 6.40±0.216 and 6.50±0.01. Iron had the highest heavy metal concentration in all the samples, especially the sediment (1000.80±0.01 mg/kg) while copper and lead had the lowest concentration of < 0.001mg/kg in all the samples except sediment sample. The total petroleum hydrocarbon in the soil (9114.86±0.036 mg/kg), exceeded DPR intervention limit while sediment (1034.46±0.022 mg/kg), surface water (2.515±0.003 µg/L) and ground water sample (32.38±0.99 µg/L) were below DPR’s limit. The soil sample had the highest total culturable heterotrophic bacterial counts and total culturable hydrocarbon utilizing bacterial counts of 5.20 ± 0.21 X 108 CFU/g and 4.00 ± 0.11 X 107 CFU/g, respectively. The following heterotrophic bacteria were isolated and identified from the samples; Pseudomonas spp, Bacillus spp, Acidiphilium spp, Acidibrevibacterium spp and Leptospirillum spp. This study has shown the presence of indigenous resident bacteria which possess the ability to degrade hydrocarbons. These bacteria can be improved through bioaugmentation and bio stimulation for the bioremediation of these sites.
Bacteria; Contamination; Crude oil; Hydrocarbons; Heavy metals
Bacteria; Contamination; Crude oil; Hydrocarbons; Heavy metals
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts