Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In the last months, governments around the world have adopted public policies to promote large-scale vaccination, and covid certificates. Whether such measures are adequate or not has been largely debated. But why have such debates emerged? To this day, alternatives to centralized decision-making have been limitedly discussed. Here, I present how an online platform could help thousands of citizens express their needs (plurality), agree on common priorities (popular consensus), and pool resources to become the protagonists of a common project, like body cells coordinate in real time to preserve life. Building on the commons, on the free/libre and open-source movement (crowdsourcing), on short online events (hackathons), and on a method to coordinate large groups, I sketch how such a platform could help citizens build solidarity-driven solutions during three-day events. Version en français
Newsletter: https://www.houseofcommons.ch – Commentable file: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BiNEdJetmszYp4Qj8-05yuVyzLMvwR-0/ – Editable file: https://houseofcommons.ch/pub/balli_brief_en.odt – Editable visuals: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tEWP54qPZrd-dqYGt3PFj_KsfEEebOhXA3fH2CeKAE0/
public participation, massive online collaboration, commons-based peer-production, grassroots movement legislation, popular rights, collective intelligence, democratic constitutionalism, libre and open-source digital democracy, citizen science and co-creation, open governance and civic technology
public participation, massive online collaboration, commons-based peer-production, grassroots movement legislation, popular rights, collective intelligence, democratic constitutionalism, libre and open-source digital democracy, citizen science and co-creation, open governance and civic technology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 82 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts