Views provided by UsageCounts
Conocephalus laetus (Redtenbacher, 1891) Xiphidium laetum Redtenbacher, 1891: 514. Conocephalus laetus – Karny, 1912: 11. — Pitkin 1980: 345. Conocephalus dubius Willemse, 1942: 95. Conocephalus raggei Harz, 1970: 194. TYPE MATERIAL. — North Australia. ♀ holotype (BMNH). Not examined. Conocephalus dubius: North Australia. ♂ holotype (NHMB); 1 ♀ allotype (NHMB). Not examined. Conocephalus raggei: Uganda. ♂ holotype (BMNH); 4 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀ paratypes (BMNH). Not examined. TYPE LOCALITY. — Australasia, Australia, North Australia. DISTRIBUTION. — Widely distributed (Africa, Australia, New Guinea, etc.). REMARKS This species has been recorded in Santo by Willemse (1925) in Hog Harbour (clearings) and Chuuri. Neither Pitkin who revised the genus in this world area, nor I have examined these specimens.
Published as part of Hugel, Sylvain, 2009, Gryllacrididae and Tettigoniidae (Insecta, Orthoptera, Ensifera) from Espiritu Santo, Vanuatu, pp. 525-576 in Zoosystema 31 (3) on page 564, DOI: 10.5252/z2009n3a10, http://zenodo.org/record/5397541
Coleoptera, Conocephalus laetus, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Conocephalus, Dryophthoridae, Taxonomy
Coleoptera, Conocephalus laetus, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Conocephalus, Dryophthoridae, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts