Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2017
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2017
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2017
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Enicospilus antefurcalis

Authors: Shimizu, So;

Enicospilus antefurcalis

Abstract

Key to species of the Enicospilus antefurcalis species-group 1 Central sclerite completely absent. Oceanic........... E. kalveus Gauld & Mitchell, 1981 – Central sclerite present (Fig. 5)...................................................................................... 2 2 Proximal corner adjacent to Rs+2r of marginal cell with wide glabrous area. Central sclerite elongate linear-oval. Eastern Palaearctic and Oriental....................................................................................................................................... E. sauteri (Enderlein, 1921) – Proximal corner of marginal cell entirely setose, without glabrous area. Central sclerite various, oval to circular (Fig. 5)..................................................................................... 3 3 Proximal and distal sclerites separated, not confluent.................................................... 4 – Proximal and distal sclerites confluent (Fig. 5)............................................................ 10 4 Lower face 0.9 times as wide as high. Clypeus wide and 1.9 times as wide as high. AI = 0.3. Australasian............................................... E. ypsilon Gauld & Mitchell, 1981 – Lower face 0.7–0.8 times as wide as high. Clypeus normal and 1.5–1.8 times as wide as high. AI = 0.4–0.5........................................................................................................... 5 5 ICI = 0.8. Distal sclerite weak. Fenestra rather small. Australasian.................................................................................................................... E. xuthus Gauld & Mitchell, 1981 – ICI = 0.4–0.6. Distal sclerite strong. Fenestra moderately large.................................... 6 6 Central sclerite large, about 40% as wide as proximal sclerite and its minimum diameter larger than minimum distance between it and Rs+2r. Afrotropical and Oriental........... 7 – Central sclerite of moderate size, less than 20% as wide as proximal sclerite and its minimum diameter smaller than minimum distance between it and Rs+2r....................... 8 7 Central sclerite weakly sclerotized and pigmented. Upper tooth of mandible 2.1–2.3 times as long as lower tooth....................................... E. aciculatus (Taschenberg, 1875) – Central sclerite moderately to strongly sclerotized and strongly pigmented. Upper tooth of mandible 1.3–1.4 times as long as lower tooth.......... E. laqueatus (Enderlein, 1921) 8 Posterior part of metasoma black. Distal 0.8 of outer surface of fore tibia with moderately dense spines. Afrotropical................................................... E. watshami Gauld, 1982 – Posterior part of metasoma not black. Distal half of outer surface of fore tibia with sparse spines.............................................................................................................................. 9 9 Central sclerite oval, its longer axis parallel to Rs+2r. Face yellowish-white except for central area. Mandibles with sparse setae. Afrotropical............ E. polemus Gauld, 1982 – Central sclerite oval to suboval, its longer axis at right angle to Rs+2r. Face entirely orange-yellow. Mandibles with dense setae. Afrotropical and Oceanic................................................................................................................ E. ruscus Gauld & Mitchell, 1978 10 Central sclerite positioned in middle of fenestra. Corner formed by distal margin of proximal screrite and proximal part of distal sclerite, more or less angulate. Australasian..................................................................................... E. xaivus Gauld & Mitchell, 1981 – Central sclerite positioned in distal part of fenestra (Fig. 5). Corner formed by distal margin of proximal sclerite and proximal part of distal sclerite, evenly curved (Fig. 5)....................................................................................................................................... 11 11 Mesosoma, coxae, T1, T2, T5–8 dark-brown to black (Fig. 5). Metapleuron roughly punctostriate (Fig. 6). Eastern Palaearctic........................................ E. kikuchii sp. nov. – Body entirely yellowish-brown or posterior part of metasoma blackish. Metapleuron uniformly punctate or finely punctostriate........................................................................ 12 12 AI = 0.2–0.3, CI = 0.2–0.3. Distal sclerite weak. Central sclerite oval and large, its longer axis reclivous and parallel to M between 2m-cu and 3rs-m. Oriental.................................................................................................................... E. marathwadensis Nikam, 1980 – AI = 0.3–1.1, CI = 0.3–0.6. Distal sclerite more or less strong. Central sclerite circular to oval, if oval more or less small and its longer axis inclivous, not parallel to M between 2m-cu and 3rs-m........................................................................................................... 13 13 Mandible twisted 10–20°. Metapleuron punctostriate or punctate. Posterior part of metasoma usually black. Australasian, Eastern Palaearctic, Oceanic, and Oriental...................................................................................................... E. melanocarpus Cameron, 1905 – Mandible twisted 25°. Metapleuron closely punctate. Posterior part of metasoma black or yellowish brown. Afrotropical................................................................................. 14 14 Posterior part of metasoma black. Central sclerite small, its maximum diameter smaller than minimum distance between it and Rs+2r. AI = 0.5–1.0...................................................................................................................................... E. bicoloratus Cameron, 1912 – Posterior part of metasoma yellowish-brown. Central sclerite moderately large, its maximum diameter larger than minimum distance between it and Rs+2r. AI = 0.3–0.5............................................................................................... E. antefurcalis (Szépligeti, 1908)

Published as part of Shimizu, So, 2017, Description of a new species and revised key to species of the Enicospilus antefurcalis species-group from Japan (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae), pp. 183-194 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 57 (1) on pages 191-192, DOI: 10.1515/aemnp-2017-0067, http://zenodo.org/record/5316015

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Enicospilus, Enicospilus antefurcalis, Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2