Figure 5. Phylogram generated from ML and Bayesian analysis using the GTR+G+I model of molecular evolution with the following parameters: K = 10; Base frequencies: freqA = 0.2945, freqC = 0.2856, freqG = 0.1962, freqT = 0.2237; rate matrix: A–C = 3.2207, A–G = 12.8698, A–T = 2.6852, C–G = 0.7080, C–T = 37.6846, G–T = 1.0000; proportion of invariable sites (I) = 0.4881; gamma distribution shape parameter = 0.4998. Score of the best tree found in the ML analysis = 18781.70 and total number of rearrangements tried = 9661. Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values (> 50%) from 100 replicates of the ML analysis and the posterior probability of the Bayesian analysis, respectively.

Published as part of Le, Minh & Mccord, William P., 2008, Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea), pp. 751-767 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 153 (4) on page 759, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00413.x, http://zenodo.org/record/5446631