Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Melobasina fossicollis

Authors: Bílý, Svatopluk; Kubáň, Vítězslav; Volkovitsh, Mark G.;

Melobasina fossicollis

Abstract

Melobasina fossicollis (Kerremans, 1906) Exagistus fossicollis Kerremans, 1906: 415. Type locality: Solomon Islands: Shortland Island [Not Bismark Archipelago!] Melobasina fossicollis: OBENBERGER (1923): 17 (note; new combination); OBENBERGER (1930): 420 (catalogue; distribution: ‘Archipel Bismarck’ – mistake); HOŁYŃSKI (1993): 27 (note); BELLAMY (2008): 625 (catalogue; distribution: Australasian: Papua New Guinea, Bismark Archipelago – mistake). Remarks. KERREMANS (1906) mentioned ‘2 exemplaires, des îles Shortland’ (length 13 mm, width 4 mm); OBENBERGER (1923) transferred this species to the genus Melobasina, evidently based on the study of one of both syntypes and on illustration of M. apicalis in KERREMANS (1903). In the corresponding volume of Obenberger’s catalogue (Obenberger 1930: 420) from the library of Obenberger (deposited in NMPC), we can find his handwritten note that this species is represented in his collection (deposited in NMPC) but we failed to find any corresponding specimen in the collection. It is evident from the description that the type specimens came from the collection of H. E. R. von Bennigsen. A part of Bennigsen’s collection (including material from New Guinea and Bismark Archipelago) was deposited in DEIC (HORN et al. 1990) and the rest was left in the collection of Bennigsen in Waitze an der Warthe (now Wiejce, by Warta river, Wojewódstwo Lubuskie, western Poland) but this species is not mentioned in the list of types deposited in DEIC (GAEDIKE 1985) and we failed to find any data about the fate of the rest of Bennigsen’s collection (e.g. in GAEDIKE 1995). According to BELLAMY (2008), the type is deposited in MNHN but we did not find this type in MNHN or BMNH. It is also not mentioned in the list of types housed in IRSN. Given the original description and the type locality, we accept the transfer proposed by OBENBERGER (1923). We are also inclined to believe that M. fossicollis and M. apicalis are conspecific. Distribution. Solomon Islands (Shortland Island).

Published as part of Bílý, Svatopluk, Kubáň, Vítězslav & Volkovitsh, Mark G., 2009, A study on the tribe Poecilonotini, with a revision of the subtribe Nesotrinchina subtrib. nov. and the description of a new genus and species from Papua New Guinea (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Chrysochroinae), pp. 729-767 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 49 (2) on pages 752-753, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5324888

Related Organizations
Keywords

Coleoptera, Melobasina, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Melobasina fossicollis, Buprestidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2