Views provided by UsageCounts
26. Philoliche Wiedemann, 1821b: 4[1821c: 54; 1828: 95]. ORIGINALLY INCLUDED SPECIES: Tabanus rostratus Linnaeus, 1758; Pangonia angulata Fabricius, 1805; Pangonia melanopyga Wiedemann, 1819; Pangonia lateralis Fabricius, 1805; Pangonia spiloptera Wiedemann, 1821; Pangonia analis Fabricius, 1805. TYPE SPECIES: Tabanus rostratus Linnaeus, 1758, by subsequent designation (Coquillett, 1910: 588). CURRENT STATUS: Valid genus [teste Sabrosky (1999: 242)]. FAMILY: TABANIDAE. REMARKS: Philoliche Wiedemann, 1821 was originally proposed within [= effectively as a subgenus of] Pangonia Latreille, 1802. Chainey & Oldroyd (1980: 286), Daniels (1989: 281) and Sabrosky (1999: 242) listed Wiedemann (1828: 95) as the first publication to make the name Philoliche available. However, Wiedemann (1821b: 4) gave characters for it and included the six species listed above. Lucas (1838: 21) and Desmarest (1859: 233) designated Tabanus fuscipennis Wiedemann, 1828 as the type species (the last of these works was followed by Sabrosky, 1999) but, although Tabanus fuscipennis Wiedemann, 1828 was originally included in the Wiedemann (1828) work, it was not an originally included species in Wiedemann (1821b), thus designations of it are invalid. The earliest designation based on originally included species is Tabanus rostratus Linnaeus, 1758 by Coquillett (1910: 588).
Published as part of EVENHUIS, NEAL L. & PONT, ADRIAN C., 2013, Nomenclatural studies toward a world catalog of Diptera genus-group names. III. Christian Rudolph Wilhelm Wiedemann, pp. 1-75 in Zootaxa 3638 (1) on page 33, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3638.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5262619
Insecta, Arthropoda, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Tabanidae, Philoliche, Taxonomy
Insecta, Arthropoda, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Tabanidae, Philoliche, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts