Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2011
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2011
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2011
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lejota Rondani 1857

Authors: O'Hara, James E.; Cerretti, Pierfilippo; Pape, Thomas; Evenhuis, Neal L.;

Lejota Rondani 1857

Abstract

281. Lejota Rondani, 1857: 176. ORIGINALLY INCLUDED SPECIES: None. FIRST INCLUDED SPECIES: Psilota ruficornis Zetterstedt & Wahlberg in Zetterstedt, 1843 (in Goffe, 1944: 29). TYPE SPECIES: Psilota ruficornis Zetterstedt & Wahlberg in Zetterstedt, 1843, by subsequent designation (Goffe, 1944: 29; for “ Leiota ”). CURRENT STATUS: Valid genus [teste Peck (1988: 208)]. FAMILY: SYRPHIDAE. REMARKS: The authorship of the type species has usually been attributed to Zetterstedt alone (e.g., Peck, 1988: 209). A check of Zetterstedt (1843) shows that both he (page 847) and Wahlberg (quoted on page 848) gave characters to distinguish the species and thus are co-authors of the species. Goffe’s (1944) use of the name “ Leiota ” is no doubt based on his using the Junk 1914 facsimile edition, in which the thick-inked letters do indeed appear to spell “ Leiota ”. The original edition clearly has the name spelled as “ Lejota ”. Although Goffe (1944: 29) designated a type species for “ Leiota ”, we interpret that action here as the same as designating for Lejota Rondani, 1856: 176 since the date and page number he cited refer to that name. Verrall in Scudder (1882: 190) listed the spelling Liota and this was cited as an emendation by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 21, “em. Verr. ap. Scudd. 1882”), but criteria for making this name available as an emendation were not found to be fulfilled in Scudder (1882). Liota Verrall, 1882 is thus an unavailable name, new status. EMENDATIONS: Liota Bezzi & Stein, 1907: 21 (unjustified).

Published as part of O'Hara, James E., Cerretti, Pierfilippo, Pape, Thomas & Evenhuis, Neal L., 2011, 3141, pp. 1-268 in Zootaxa 3141 on page 103

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Syrphidae, Lejota, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green