Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Heterogaster urticae

Authors: Malipatil, M. B.;

Heterogaster urticae

Abstract

Aedeagus of Heterogaster urticae (Fabricius, 1775) (Figs. 56–61) Specimens examined. 2 males, Czech Republic, “ Moravia, mar. 30.5.1975, Konice u Znojma 11/75, Popicky vrch, 290 m, lgt. J. L. Stehlik ”, “ Collectio J. L. Stehlik Mor. museum, Brno”, “ Heterogaster urticae (Fabricius) det J.L. Stehlik 1976”, in VAIC. Ashlock (1957) provided notes on the phallus of Heterogastridae without being able to successfully inflate the inflatable parts of the endosoma of representatives of the family. His notes were therefore based on Servedei (1951) who had described and figured the phallotheca and part of the inflatable portions of the endosoma of Heterogaster urticae (Fabricius). On close examination I find this figure, reproduced in Schuh & Weirauch (2020), rather inaccurate since it was based on an incompletely inflated portion of endosoma. Therefore, a detailed corrected figure and description of aedeagus of this species, along with those Parathyginus species included in the present contribution, are given as the first representatives of the family Heterogastridae. Following Ashlock, Henry (1997) scored the character and states in his matrix table and interpreted “not inflatable conjunctiva” as derived, a major character grouping Heterogastridae with the family Pachygronthidae in his cladistic analysis of the Lygaeoidea. Considering the present study, the foresaid character needs to be reassessed and rescored, and its implications on the relationships of these and related families be reviewed. In the present study, I successfully and fully inflated the endosoma (conjunctiva + vesica) to provide the following detailed description. The basal plate (articulatory apparatus) (Fig. 56), only partly fused with the highly sclerotized and pigmented phallotheca (Fig. 57, ph). The phallotheca in upper view (Fig. 58), with antero-lateral margins of distal end produced to sclerotized arm like processes, area between the arms, where the conjunctiva attaches (Fig. 57, co), is slightly less pigmented in pattern seen in Fig. 58; in lateral view the phallotheca (Fig. 57, ph), lower surface (facing apodeme surface within pygophore) is uniformly but strongly curved, however the upper surface is rather bulbous and conspicuously constricted in distal 1/3. The conjunctiva (Fig. 57, co) is membranous, tubular and of slightly variable girth notably in distal half, extremely long about 4 times the length of phallotheca and about 5 times the length of vesica (Fig. 57, ve), sharply turned at a couple of places, the sharper turn seen at about half its length, and appears to have a pair of large membranous lobes (Fig. 59, cl), on its wall towards distal end, but lacking any processes. The seminal duct (ductus seminis) (Figs. 60, 61, sd) is not clearly visible through most of the length of the conjunctiva, but becomes distinct near ejaculatory reservoir (Fig. 60, er); ejaculatory reservoir is modified to heavily pigmented and sclerotized body and neck undifferentiated from vesical seminal duct, with traces of wings appearing to be distinct (Fig. 60); the seminal duct in vesica continues as a heavily pigmented and sclerotized narrow parallel sided plate that is gradually curved ventrally to end as a complex structure comprising gonoporal process and associated parts (Fig. 60, 61); vesica (Fig. 57, ve) short, tubular and appearing to possess one asymmetrical membranous lobe (Fig. 59, vl) near its base, but lacking any processes. In summary, based on the dissections of Heterogaster urticae and the included species of Parathyginus the following comments may be made in relation to the aedeagal features. The conjunctiva is unusually long (about 5 times) compared to the vesica; the ejaculatory reservoir is highly modified and often greatly reduced; the vesica is short and tubular, with or without membranous lobes, but lacking any processes; and the vesical seminal duct is highly modified, gradually bending ventrally to end as a complex structure comprising gonoporal process and associated parts. A comprehensive review however of these unusual features in the family Heterogastridae and the related taxa is beyond the scope of this paper.

Published as part of Malipatil, M. B., 2021, Revision of Australian Parathyginus with description of two new species, along with first detailed description of aedeagus in the family Heterogastridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea), pp. 503-522 in Zootaxa 5016 (4) on pages 519-521, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5016.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/5222487

Related Organizations
Keywords

Hemiptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Heterogaster, Biodiversity, Heterogaster urticae, Heterogastridae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2