Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 11449/218645 , 11449/229842
Amphibian reproductive modes (RMs) have been extensively described and applied to amphibian biology studies. However, due to new behavioural observations and past system inconsistencies we found it necessary to review the current classification and redefine the sets of characters which define amphibian RMs. We suggest the use of 11 characters that include phases from egg to early development (including or not including larval stages) and we do not include behavioural aspects that are in general hard to identify, such as parental care, except those related to feeding and incubation. Based on 2,171 amphibian species (roughly a fourth of the species known), we built a dichotomous tree with 74 different possible RMs for amphibians - almost twice the number of the previous classification categories. This system could possibly be applied to other vertebrates as well and therefore facilitate comparisons across different taxa.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Processo FAPESP: 2008/50325-5
Processo FAPESP: 2011/51694-7
Processo FAPESP: 2014/23388-7
Processo FAPESP: 2019/18335-5
Processo FAPESP: 2013/50741-7
Processo FAPESP: 2014/50342-8
reproductive strategies, Caudata, Reproduction, 590, Anura, Caudata, Gymnophiona, reproduction, behaviour, reproductive strategies, breeding biology, behaviour, reproduction, Breeding biology, Reproductive strategies, breeding biology, Gymnophiona, Behaviour, Anura
reproductive strategies, Caudata, Reproduction, 590, Anura, Caudata, Gymnophiona, reproduction, behaviour, reproductive strategies, breeding biology, behaviour, reproduction, Breeding biology, Reproductive strategies, breeding biology, Gymnophiona, Behaviour, Anura
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 13 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts