Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

5 best practices vanuit het Netwerk Digitaal Erfgoed over het gebruik van preserveringstools

Authors: Hellema, Marian; Molenda, Ania;

5 best practices vanuit het Netwerk Digitaal Erfgoed over het gebruik van preserveringstools

Abstract

Als onderdeel van het project ‘Preserveringstools' van het Netwerk Digitaal Erfgoed werd in 2019 een survey onder Nederlandse erfgoedinstellingen uitgevoerd over het gebruik van preserveringstools. Uit de respons bleek dat het erfgoedveld behoefte heeft aan verhalen uit de praktijk: hoe gaan andere instellingen om met het (pre-)ingest proces? Welke preserveringstools gebruiken zij? Bestaat er een one-size-fits-all tool? In deze publicatie (juni 2021) zijn de ervaringen van het Noord-Hollands Archief, de Koninklijke Bibliotheek, het Regionaal Archief Zutphen, het Utrechts Archief, Tresoar en het Nationaal Archief verzameld. Erfgoedinstellingen die zelf aan de slag willen met preserveringstools, vinden hier in één oogopslag vijf best practices en talloze praktische (lees)tips.

De 5 best practices zijn: 1. Eigen regie over pre-ingest. De Pre-ingest Tool van het Noord-Hollands Archief. 2. Van voorkeursformaten naar kennisniveaus. Het denken over bestandsformaten bij de Koninklijke Bibliotheek. 3. Archief-metadata op orde krijgen. Gezamenlijke ontwikkeling van ToPX Creator. 4. Het Digitaal Atelier. Zoektocht naar gemeenschappelijke preserveringsoplossingen. 5. Profiel maken van digitale archieven. Impactanalyse met FITS en C3PO bij het Nationaal Archief.

Keywords

Digitaal Atelier, voorkeursformaten, Archiefmetadata, kennisniveaus, best practice, pre-ingest, preserveringstools, digitale archieven, Netwerk Digitaal Erfgoed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 77
    download downloads 70
  • 77
    views
    70
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
77
70