Downloads provided by UsageCounts
There are many planet candidates identified by Kepler and TESS space telescopes that have yet to be confirmed as planets or false positives. We investigate these planet candidates by combining data from both Kepler and TESS, which allows us to confirm or rule out more planets than either would by itself. We use a method called "ephemeris matching" to identify contamination caused by astrophysical events like eclipsing binary stars. We will match signals from Kepler with newly identified signals from TESS to identify likely false positives. By identifying new false positives, we will boost our confidence in the surviving signals.
{"references": ["Coughlin, J. L., Thompson, S. E., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2014, The Astronomical Journal, 147, 119"]}
Exoplanets, Ephemeris Matching, Kepler
Exoplanets, Ephemeris Matching, Kepler
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 17 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts