Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Wrong Answers for Wrong Reasons: The Risks of Ad Hoc Instruments

Authors: Chiodini Luca;

Wrong Answers for Wrong Reasons: The Risks of Ad Hoc Instruments

Abstract

This folder contains anonymized data from the experiment described in the paper "Wrong Answers for Wrong Reasons: The Risks of Ad Hoc Instruments". questions.md contains the 14 questions used as pre/post-test Participants are identified using numeric identifiers (from 1 to 40). conditions.csv contains the mapping between participants identifiers and their condition {test}_{assessment_type}_anon.csv contains data for a given test (pretest or posttest) using a certain assessment type. Two assessment types are used: mc (multiple choice as assessed by Moodle: 0 means wrong, 1 means correct, - means missing) revised (human revision after reading the explanation: the judgment is either a 0 or a 1 following what presented in the paper) Statistics are computed with Python and SciPy. You can execute the script by running: python3 main.py and you should get this output: === Analyzing answers using mc as assessment type === Results on pretest - Condition Text: N: 21, mean ± std: 9.81 ± 3.03 Results on pretest - Condition Graphic: N: 19, mean ± std: 9.68 ± 2.11 Mann Whitney U on pretest scores: U=184.0, p=0.3406 Results on posttest - Condition Text: N: 21, mean ± std: 11.19 ± 2.75 Results on posttest - Condition Graphic: N: 19, mean ± std: 10.74 ± 2.23 Mann Whitney U on posttest scores: U=164.0, p=0.1681 === Analyzing answers using revised as assessment type === Results on pretest - Condition Text: N: 20, mean ± std: 9.15 ± 3.10 Results on pretest - Condition Graphic: N: 19, mean ± std: 7.89 ± 3.16 Mann Whitney U on pretest scores: U=150.5, p=0.1344 Results on posttest - Condition Text: N: 20, mean ± std: 11.15 ± 2.39 Results on posttest - Condition Graphic: N: 19, mean ± std: 9.42 ± 3.11 Mann Whitney U on posttest scores: U=123.0, p=0.0299 You might need to install scipy (e.g., depending on your setup, pip install scipy).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 4
  • 6
    views
    4
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
4
Green