Views provided by UsageCounts
Code for the article entitled: "Direct fitness benefits are a prerequisite for the evolution of cooperative breeding" The evolution of cooperative breeding has been traditionally attributed to the effect of kin selection. While there is increasing empirical evidence that direct fitness benefits are relevant, the relative importance of alternative selection mechanisms is largely obscure. Here, we model the coevolution of the cornerstones of cooperative breeding, delayed dispersal and alloparental care, across different ecological scenarios, enabling philopatry and helping levels to adjust to social context. Results show that (1) direct fitness benefits from grouping are essential and sufficient to explain the evolution of both philopatry and helping; (2) kin selection is not vital for the evolution of cooperative breeding but can enhance helping levels; (3) the coevolution of philopatry and alloparental care is subject to positive feedback; (4) age-dependent dispersal is triggered by both group benefits and relatedness. Model predictions are supported by empirical data and provide novel opportunities for comparative analyses and experimental tests of causality.
evolution, animal behaviour, cooperation
evolution, animal behaviour, cooperation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts