Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Taumacera nigripennis

Authors: Bezděk, Jan;

Taumacera nigripennis

Abstract

Taumacera nigripennis (Jacoby, 1884) Platyxantha (?) nigripennis Jacoby, 1884b: 225 (original description) Type material examined. SYNTYPES: 1 ♀, ‘v.d.Bossche / Banka [w, h] // Platyxantha? / nigripennis / Jac. [b, h]’ (RMNH); 1 ♀ (photograph), ‘v.d.Bossche / Banka [w, h] // 1st Jacoby / Coll. [w, p] // Type [p] / 18350 [r, h] // Platyxantha / nigripennis / n. sp. Jacoby [w, h]’ (MCZ). Comments. JACOBY (1884b) described this species from four specimens: ‘There are now four specimens contained in the present collection which I take to represent two males, from Banka (v. d. Bossche), and two females, from Serdang (Hagen)’. He also mentioned some differences, particularly more the transverse pronotum in the two specimens from Serdang. I examined one syntype from Banka (RMNH, = Bangka Isl., Sumatra) and a photograph of the other one (MCZ). Undoubtedly, both syntypes from Banka are females. Thus the differences in the shape of the pronotum cannot be attributed to sexual dimorphism, but more probably they belong to different species. However, the two females from Serdang were not examined (probably they are deposited in the RMNH) thus I avoid to designate a lectotype and the species identity needs further study. Tentatively I did not place this species into any species group. Some specimens labelled as types can be found also in the MSNG and BMNH but cannot be treated as type specimens. Two females from MSNG refer to specimens published by JACOBY (1896a) as Dorydea nigripennis. It is not quite clear if the male from the BMNH labelled as ‘type’ refer to the male specimen mentioned in JACOBY (1896a) or to the series and drawing in JACOBY (1899). Another nontype male from Soekaranda (Dohrn leg.) mentionedin JACOBY (1899) is also deposited in BMNH. However, I am not sure if these males are conspecific with the females from the type series or not.

Published as part of Bezděk, Jan, 2019, Taumacera revisited, with new synonyms, new combinations and a revised catalogue of the species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae), pp. 23-52 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae (Acta. Ent. Mus. Natl. Pragae) (Acta. Ent. Mus. Natl. Pragae) 59 (1) on page 39, DOI: 10.2478/aemnp-2019-0003, http://zenodo.org/record/4505520

Related Organizations
Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Chrysomelidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taumacera nigripennis, Taumacera, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green