Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Oonopoides endicus Platnick & Berniker 2013, new combination

Authors: Platnick, Norman I.; Berniker, Lily;

Oonopoides endicus Platnick & Berniker 2013, new combination

Abstract

Oonopoides endicus (Chickering), new combination Figures 12–92Oonops endicusChickering, 1971: 209, figs. 21–23 (male holotype from South Bimini, Bahama Islands, in AMNH; examined); not figs. 24, 25, female (=Oonopoides iviei). DIAGNOSIS: Males can be recognized by the abruptly bent tip of the embolus (figs. 43, 46), females by the hypertrophied posterior receptaculum (figs. 89, 90). MALE (PBI_OON 37975, figs. 12–53): Total length 1.72. Posterior eye row straight from front; ALE separated by more than their diameter. Endites distally excavated, anterior portion with single, strongly protuberant ledge. Postepigastric scutum absent. Leg spination: femora III, IV d1-0-1; tibiae: III p1-1-0, v0-0-2, r1-1-0; IV d1-1-0, p1-0-1, v0-2-2, r1-0-0; metatarsi: III v0-0-1p, r1-1-0; IV p1-1-0, v2-0-2, r1-1-0. Embolar base with long, narrow projection; embolus abruptly bent. FEMALE (PBI_OON 37975, figs. 54–92): Total length 2.63. Leg spination: femora: III d1-01; IV d1-0-0; tibiae: III p1-1-0, v0-1p-2, r1-1-0; IV d1-1-0, p1-0-1, v0-1p-2, r1-0-0; metatarsi: III v0-0-1p, r1-1-0; IV p1-1-1, v1p-0-2, r1-1-0. Anterior receptaculum small, anteriorly widened, globular; posterior receptaculum hypertrophied, ducts with anterior pair of large, longitudinal loops anteriorly, numerous smaller, transverse loops posteriorly. MATERIAL EXAMINED: UNITED STATES: Florida: Monroe Co.: 2 mi SE Marathon, 24°37′N, 81°06′W, Dec. 15, 1962 (W. Ivie, AMNH PBI_OON 1101, 37975, 37977), 33♂, 17♀. WEST INDIES: Bahama Islands: South Bimini, May 1951 (W. Gertsch, M. Cazier, AMNH PBI_OON 37319), 1♂ (holotype), same (AMNH PBI_OON 1667, 37316), 14♂ (paratypes), June 1951 (M. Cazier, C., P. Vaurie, AMNH PBI_OON 1832), 2♂ (paratypes). DISTRIBUTION: Far southern Florida and the Bahama Islands. Oonopoides iviei, new species Figures 93–103 Oonops balanus (misidentification): Chickering, 1971: 204 (some males from South Bimini only). Oonops endicus (misidentification): Chickering, 1971: 209, figs. 24, 25 (females only). TYPE: Male holotype taken on South Bimini, Bahama Islands (May 1951; W. Gertsch, M. Cazier), deposited in AMNH (PBI_OON 51291) ETYMOLOGY: The specific name is a patronym in honor of Wilton Ivie, who was the first person to collect specimens of Oonopoides in Florida. DIAGNOSIS: Males resemble those from Bimini described (but probably misidentified) as “ Oonops balanus ” by Chickering (1971: figs. 1–11), but have a longer, more evenly curved embolus (figs. 97, 100); females have a distally narrow anterior receptaculum and a heavily sclerotized, W-shaped anterior margin of the posterior receptaculum (figs. 102,103). MALE (PBI_OON 37348, figs. 93–101): Total length 1.83. Posterior eye row straight from front; ALE separated by their radius to diameter. Endites distally not excavated, anterior portion with single, rounded, protuberant ledge. Postepigastric scutum absent. Leg spination: femur IV d1-0-0; tibiae: III p0-0-1, v0-1p-2; IV d0-1-0, p1-0-1, v0-1p-2, r0-0-1; metatarsi: III v0-0-2; IV p1-0-1, v0-0-1p, r1-0-1. Embolus gently arched, with basal projection reduced to tiny spur no longer than tiny projections on hyaline conductor. FEMALE (PBI_OON 1719, figs. 102, 103): Total length 1.97. ALE separated by more than their diameter. Leg spination: femur III d1-0-0; tibiae: III p1-0-0, v1p-0-2, r1-0-0; IV p0-1-1, v0-1r-2; metatarsi: III v0-1p-2; IV p1-0-0, v0-1p-2, r0-0-1. Anterior receptaculum narrow, tubular, posterior receptaculum with heavily sclerotized, W-shaped anterior margin. OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED: UNITED STATES: Florida: Monroe Co.: Big Pine Key, E end, 24°40′N, 81°22′W, Dec. 13, 1962 (W. Ivie, AMNH PBI_OON 37348), 2♂; Big Pine Key, Jack Watson Nature Trail, off Key Deer Boulevard, Nov. 8, 2007, buttonwood leaf litter (P. Sierwald, FMNH 44208, PBI_OON 10687), 1♀; Long Key State Recreation Area, July 31, 1981, leaf litter, xeric scrub (D. Ubick, CDU PBI_OON 35673), 1♂. WEST INDIES: Bahama Islands: Andros Island: Pigeon Cay, May 1–6, 1994, Berlese, coastal coppice litter (R. Anderson, AMNH PBI_OON 1768), 1♂, 2♀, same, Berlese, buttonwood coppice litter (R. Anderson, AMNH PBI_OON 1767), 1♀; North Bimini, Dec. 31, 1952 (E. Hayden, AMNH PBI_OON 1465), 1♂; South Bimini, May 1951 (W. Gertsch, M. Cazier, AMNH PBI_OON 1608, 1625, 1718, 1719, 1823, 37323), 16♂, 31♀, June 1951 (M. Cazier, C., P. Vaurie, AMNH PBI_OON 1601), 2♀. DISTRIBUTION: Far southern Florida and the Bahama Islands.

Published as part of Platnick, Norman I. & Berniker, Lily, 2013, The goblin spider genus Oonopoides in North and Central America (Araneae, Oonopidae), pp. 1-38 in American Museum Novitates 2013 (3788) on pages 7-15, DOI: 10.1206/3788.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4598043

Related Organizations
Keywords

Oonopoides, Oonopidae, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Oonopoides endicus, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
  • 4
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
Green