Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This paper focuses on a simple, lightweight model with tools and practices to help small scientific software teams introduce structure and process to their management efforts. We emphasize a handful of tools and practices we have found to be broadly useful. This model has been used and evolved as part of the author’s student research efforts at St. John’s University. The model, tools and practices described here can be useful for large teams, too. Often large teams are composed of small teams, so these practices can be applied at the small team level and applied similarly to cross-team leadership as a group. Furthermore, team policy becomes even more important on large teams, as do lightweight communication strategies such as project Kanban boards where the status of activities can be referenced asynchronously via online tools.
software methodologies, scientific software
software methodologies, scientific software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts