Views provided by UsageCounts
This dataset contains a JSON file containing the results retrieved through the software developed by the authors. We opted for JSON file format to store the obtained data, since this format allows the storage of heterogeneous information in a complex and structured way. The three main structures stored in the present file are: 1) "publishers", a list of dictionaries representing each publisher encountered; 2) "citations", a dictionary containing two lists, the one storing the validated citational data and the other storing the still invalid citational data. Each processed citation is represented as a dictionary. 3) "total_num_of_valid_citations", whose value is the number of citational data that could be validated throughout the process implemented by our software. We used as input material open data from the dataset “Citations to invalid DOI-identified entities obtained from processing DOI-to-DOI citations to add in COCI”.
DOI, Open Science, Digital Object Identifier, Crossref, OpenCitations, publishers, publisher
DOI, Open Science, Digital Object Identifier, Crossref, OpenCitations, publishers, publisher
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts