Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2021
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Software . 2021
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

lnnrtwttkhn/talk-rdm: Version 1.0 of talk on a workflow for open and reproducible MRI studies, prepared for the Max Planck Digital Library

Authors: Lennart Wittkuhn;

lnnrtwttkhn/talk-rdm: Version 1.0 of talk on a workflow for open and reproducible MRI studies, prepared for the Max Planck Digital Library

Abstract

About Version 1.0 of this talk, titled "Towards a workflow for open and reproducible fMRI studies", was prepared for the "Discussion Series: Human Research Data in Practice" hosted by the Max Planck Digital Library (see details here) on 22nd June 2021. Abstract Achieving computational reproducibility and accessible data sharing can be challenging, in particular for neuroimaging research that involves large amounts of heterogeneous data and code. Here, we showcase a workflow that combines several software tools to allow reproducibility and transparent sharing of code and data of a human fMRI study. We recently published an open-access paper (Wittkuhn & Schuck, 2021, Nature Communications) together with the code, data and computational environments needed to reproduce the reported results. We shared > 10 datasets via GIN (G-Node Infrastructure) as modular version-controlled units, including fMRI data organized in BIDS format and derived data, such as pre-processed fMRI data and data quality metrics. Research data was version-controlled using DataLad. Following the DataLad YODA principles, we nested datasets as modular units, allowing to better establish data provenance, i.e., a clear overview which code used which input data to produce which output data. Code that reproduced the analyses was integrated with additional documentation using RMarkdown notebooks. The notebooks were automatically executed using continuous integration on GitLab. In this process, data was retrieved from GIN using DataLad, the notebooks were rendered and deployed to a website (https://wittkuhn.mpib.berlin/highspeed/). Code execution was performed using software containers (Docker and Singularity) and virtual environments, allowing to reproduce the computational environment.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 5
  • 5
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
5
Related to Research communities