Downloads provided by UsageCounts
{"references": ["Joint study of [the French] Autorit\u00e9 de la concurrence and [German] Bundeskartellamt (2019) Algorithms and Competition. Availabe from: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/EN/Berichte/Algorithms_and_Competition_Working-Paper.pdf [Accessed September, 12 2020].", "Bundeskartellamt, BWB (2018): Guidance on transaction value thresholds for mandatory pre-merger notifcation (Section 35 (1a) GWB and Section 9 (4) KartG, para 11. Available from: https://www. bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/EN/Leitfaden/Leitfaden_Transaktionsschwelle. pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 [Accessed September, 12 2020].", "WMG, ICN recommended practices for merger notifcation and review procedures (2017), point II.A. Available from: https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ MWG_NPRecPractices2018.pdf [Accessed September, 12 2020].", "OECD (2020) DAF/COMP/WD(2020)20, Start-ups, killer acquisitions and merger control \u2013Note by Germany, p. 3. Available from: https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2020)20/en/ pdf [Accessed September, 12 2020].", "Autorit\u00e9 de la concurrence (2020) The Autorit\u00e9 de la concurrence's contribution to the debate on competition policy and digital challenges. Available from: https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/sites/ default/fles/2020-03/2020.03.02_contribution_adlc_enjeux_numeriques_vf_en.pdf [Accessed September, 12 2020]."]}
This unit was published in „International Cooperation of Competition Authorities in Europe: from Bilateral Agreements to Transgovernmental Networks” Błachucki, M., ed., (2020). The acquistion of WhatsApp by Facebook in 2014 revealed that the internationally prevalent system of turnover-based merger control thresholds was struggling to cope with cases in the digital world in which merging parties, typically acquisition targets, do not generate sufficient turnover to fall under turnover thresholds of international merger control regimes. The German and Austrian legislators reacted by introducing new size of transaction tests in their merger control thresholds, with the German and Austrian competition authorities issuing respective guidelines in 2017/2018. In various jurisdictions and at the EU level, the question arose whether such thresholds should also be introduced, or whether it will suffice if Germany and Austria could control high value low turnover transactions and could refer them to the EU level under the existing EU Merger Regulation’s referral mechanism. This article sheds light on this debate. It explains the details of the German and Austrian size of transaction tests and the joint German-Austrian guidelines, and analyses how they, and the typical transaction value merger cases, fit into the referral mechanism of the EU Merger Regulation.
merger cases, merger control, German-Austrian guidelines, Facebook, merger control thresholds, transaction value threshold, WhatsApp, NCA, German and Austrian experiences, merger control regimes, EUMR, EU level, EU Merger Regulation's referral mechanism, Germany, Austria, EU Merger Regulation, national merger thresholds, European Commission, competition, Merger Regulation, referral mechanism
merger cases, merger control, German-Austrian guidelines, Facebook, merger control thresholds, transaction value threshold, WhatsApp, NCA, German and Austrian experiences, merger control regimes, EUMR, EU level, EU Merger Regulation's referral mechanism, Germany, Austria, EU Merger Regulation, national merger thresholds, European Commission, competition, Merger Regulation, referral mechanism
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts