Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In printing world, Sheet-Fed-offset has been popular and trending method of printing since some decades. Digital printing methods are getting popular now a days because of its quality and less production time. This paper throws light on comparison of rub resistance of sheet fed offset and digital printing process on uncoated, gloss coated and matte coated paper. To test the rub resistance a master chart was prepared consisting on line images, middle tone images and solid areas. The chart was printed by both printing processes on all above mentioned three grades of paper. The samples were tested using digital scuff tester. The results indicated that digital printing has more rub resistance compared to sheet fed offset.
Sheet Fed-Offset, Dry Toner Digital Printing, Uncoated Paper, Gloss Coated Paper, Matte Coated Paper, Rub Resistance.
Sheet Fed-Offset, Dry Toner Digital Printing, Uncoated Paper, Gloss Coated Paper, Matte Coated Paper, Rub Resistance.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts